At that time, all documents related to the murder (around five million pages) were handed over to the National Archives.

At that time, all documents related to the murder (around five million pages) were handed over to the National Archives.

At that time, all documents related to the murder (around five million pages) were handed over to the National Archives. 88 percent were made public immediately, in 11 percent “” sensitive areas “” were removed and about one percent remained completely in the dark. However, these tens of thousands of pages also have to be published within 25 years, was determined at the time. The deadline is today. Only the President can order something else. Donald Trump has already announced that he will not block the publication.

So what was sensitive enough for the US government to keep secret for so long? The official version of the incident is as follows: The communist Lee Harvey Oswald shot the President from the sixth floor of the nearby school book warehouse. He was a lone perpetrator and not part of a domestic or foreign conspiracy. He also killed policeman JD Tippit within an hour of the attack, and was arrested shortly afterwards. Two days later, Oswald was shot dead by nightclub owner Jack Ruby at the Dallas Police Station. So it says in the report of the Warren Commission appointed by Kennedy’s successor Lyndon B. Johnson. A panel of four doctors in 1968 and the Rockefeller Commission in 1975 largely confirmed these results.

Second shooter or Soviet conspiracy?

A 1979 House of Representatives Committee of Inquiry also largely endorsed the Warren report, but at the same time ruled that there was “” a high probability that two riflemen shot President Kennedy “”. The “” second “” or any other shooter is one of the most popular alternative theories to the official account. He is said to have shot Kennedy from a small hill of grass near the vehicle, and thus from the front, not from behind like Oswald. A video of the murder is often argued with, showing Kennedy’s head being pushed back. However, medical models have shown that this is not really unusual.

The results of the investigation into the background to the crime are even more violently disputed. It seems unlikely to many that Oswald was a mere lone perpetrator who acted without any support. He was a Marxist and lived in the Soviet Union from 1959 to 1962 because he himself declared that he was against the USA. There he married the niece of a colonel of the KGB. Allegedly disappointed in the Soviet Union, he returned to the United States with his wife and child. Two months before the attack, however, he visited the Soviet and Cuban embassies in Mexico City again. What he did there is unclear. Was Kennedy’s assassination a long-planned operation by Soviet intelligence? However, many Kennedy researchers warn against too high expectations of the new documents. If a really “” bomb “” were to be found in it, it would have become known long ago.account essay example

Read news for 1 month now for free! * * The test ends automatically. More on this ▶Win true wireless earphones from JBL now! (E-media.at) New access (yachtrevue.at) 8 reasons why it’s great to be single (lustaufsleben.at) Salmon shrimp burger with wasabi mayonnaise and honey cucumber (gusto .at) In the new trend: Shock-Down – how long can the economy withstand lockdowns? (trend.at) The 35 best family series for laughing and feeling good (tv-media.at) E-Scooter in Vienna: All providers and Prices 2020 in comparison (autorevue.at)

Democracy needs decency. A basic decency consensus. That politicians are not allowed to say anything that gets them to agree with their clientele

Seven French authors of young adult books have each written a chapter of a novel. It describes how the election victory of the “Party of Freedom” “affects the lives of seven young people in different milieus. They have had bad experiences and it is said again and again: “” We saw nothing coming. “” The preface was written by Stéphane Hessel, the author of “” Outrage! When I read the book, some things seemed a little exaggerated. I thought to myself, at least with us it wouldn’t be possible for someone to have to leave the country even though they have lived here for years. That people are classified according to how light or how dark their skin is. That disabled people, hippies, dropouts, old people and homosexuals have to fear for their future. Austria is a constitutional state. But I’m not so sure anymore. When an interior minister says: “” I still believe that the principle applies that the law has to follow politics and not politics should follow the law “”, he is attacking the rule of law. The rule of law is characterized by the fact that there are binding rules that apply to everyone. For politics as well as for the citizens. Rules that determine how we should behave, what we must and must not do, and rules that determine how rules come about and how they can be changed. Some have argued that the Interior Minister only wanted to say that rules can also be changed, and of course only in a constitutional process. If that were the case, I don’t know why he said it this way and in this context. Not just a lawyer, but also a philosopher – the Minister of the Interior studied philosophy – must know that when it comes to statements, it always depends on how they are received. That the “” recipient horizon “” is decisive and not inner motives that the other person cannot even recognize.

And the Minister of the Interior obviously had an eye on the “recipient horizon”. Because the statement is clearly aimed at people who think it’s good how action is finally taken against criminal asylum seekers and persons entitled to asylum, against immigrants in the social system, against social parasites. Against unwanted people who disturb our beautiful image of Austria and our unclouded self-image because they speak a different language, look different, have a different religion or simply don’t want to get up in the morning. These people are perceived as a threat, they are frightening, and fear calls for someone to protect against them, to ward off the dangers and not be bothered by outdated rules. Rules that originate from a long time ago and simply no longer apply today. Because today we can no longer afford this humanity. Anyone who claims otherwise is a “” do-gooder “”, a dreamer, a leftist. These people only criticize the interior minister’s progressive policies because they are no longer in charge. Because they – at last! – have lost opinion leadership. And finally you can say again what you think – without having to change. The limit of what can be said is pushed further and further outwards. What would have been unspeakable a few years ago no longer upsets the majority today. Sebastian Haffner describes in the “” History of a German “” how public opinion slowly adapted to the prevailing ideology in the 1930s. A few days ago I was asked by a young man if I thought that democracy was in danger. Hans Kelsen, the creator of our Federal Constitution, also included the possibility of an overall amendment to the constitution. Because he was convinced that it is the inalienable right of the people to determine the form of government. And that can also be an authoritarian regime, without separation of powers, without independent jurisdiction, without equality before the law. Because the people are the sovereign. Therefore it also says in Article 1 of the Federal Constitution: The right proceeds from the people.

We have to ask ourselves what we really want. There are examples of authoritarian regimes being successful, more successful than some democracies. We also have to admit that it has never been so easy to influence people, to convince them of things that seem downright absurd on closer inspection. The vote on Brexit, as well as Trump and Bolsonaro’s election victories, are striking evidence. They are also convincing evidence that democracy needs decency. A basic decency consensus. That politicians are not allowed to say everything that gets them to agree with their clientele. That they are not allowed to say against their better judgment – a recent example – that the EU has initiated infringement proceedings against Austria because it does not want Austrian families to be promoted. That they measure what they say and what they do against a standard that is not just the approval they get in the next survey. It is therefore up to both sides to choose and choose. Democracy is not set in stone. We have to secure it for ourselves over and over again, through vigilance, through critical questioning, through standing up for what we believe is right. Democracy has many enemies. Last but not least, our own comfort. She doesn’t excuse us. Because we didn’t see anything coming, we won’t be able to say.

“” We didn’t see anything coming “”, Edition Bernest, ISBN 978-3-902984-51-7.12 euros

Read news for 1 month now for free! * * The test ends automatically. More on this ▶Win true wireless earphones from JBL now! (E-media.at) New access (yachtrevue.at) 8 reasons why it’s great to be single (lustaufsleben.at) Salmon shrimp burger with wasabi mayonnaise and honey cucumber (gusto .at) In the new trend: Shock-Down – how long can the economy withstand lockdowns? (trend.at) The 35 best family series for laughing and feeling good (tv-media.at) E-Scooter in Vienna: All providers and Prices 2020 in comparison (autorevue.at)

Comments

Login Connect with Facebook Roland Mösl Fri., Feb 01 .. 2019 14:24 report reply

At a NEOS event in 2017, Griss demanded: Instead of 24 months grace period, only 6 months for men and 6 months for women. This is intended to reach even fewer children.

Page 1 of 1  

With regard to Covid-19 diseases, there is also the question of treatment capacities for patients with severe disease.

“Austria and Germany are in a comparatively better situation than Italy or France, for example,” “Klaus Markstaller, President of the Austrian Society of Intensive Care Physicians (ÖGARI) told the APA.

“We also have more intensive care beds per inhabitant”

“” Overall, we have more hospital beds per inhabitant. We also have more intensive care beds per inhabitant, “explained Markstaller. “” In Vienna we have almost 600 beds of this type. At AKH Vienna there are 140 here alone. “”

Even if you are currently in a favorable situation, there is nothing to appease. “” Of course we in Austria can also get into a critical situation, depending on how the virus spreads. But that is not foreseeable, “” emphasized the expert.

Since viral pneumonia or, in the most severe case, acute respiratory failure (ARDS) is in the foreground in the event of a severe course of the disease caused by a SARS-CoV-2 infection, the main concern is the capacity to ventilate those affected artificially. A step-by-step approach to capacity is necessary, said Markstaller.

“There are always locked beds too”

“” There are always locked beds. They will be opened. Then efforts will be made to transfer patients in intensive care units back to normal wards as quickly as possible. Of course, you can also control the inflow somewhat. If there is no disadvantage for the person concerned, planned surgical interventions, which will require intensive medical care afterwards, will be postponed, “” explained the expert.

“In addition, in Austria, in addition to intensive care beds, we also have a relatively large number of beds in recovery wards that can be quickly upgraded for patients who need ventilation,” said Markstaller. The intermediate care units would then also be available.

But the technical facilities are only one point. “” Staff is a critical issue. That is already close. And finally, members of the medical staff can also be affected by Covid-19, “said the ÖGARI President.

Read news for 1 month now for free! * * The test ends automatically. More on this ▶Win true wireless earphones from JBL now! (E-media.at) New access (yachtrevue.at) 8 reasons why it’s great to be single (lustaufsleben.at) Salmon shrimp burger with wasabi mayonnaise and honey cucumber (gusto .at) In the new trend: Shock-Down – how long can the economy withstand lockdowns? (trend.at) The 35 best family series for laughing and feeling good (tv-media.at) E-Scooter in Vienna: All providers and Prices 2020 in comparison (autorevue.at)

Comments

Sign in Connect to Facebook

With regard to Covid-19 diseases, there is also the question of treatment capacities for patients with severe disease.

“Austria and Germany are in a comparatively better situation than Italy or France, for example,” “said Klaus Markstaller, President of the Austrian Society of Intensive Care Physicians (ÖGARI) to the APA.

“We also have more intensive care beds per inhabitant”

“” Overall, we have more hospital beds per inhabitant. We also have more intensive care beds per inhabitant, “explained Markstaller. “” In Vienna we have almost 600 such beds. At AKH Vienna there are 140 here alone. “”

Even if you are currently in a favorable situation, there is nothing to appease. “” Of course we in Austria can also get into a critical situation, depending on how the virus spreads. But that is not foreseeable, “” emphasized the expert.

Since viral pneumonia or, in the most severe case, acute respiratory failure (ARDS) is in the foreground when the disease is severe due to a SARS-CoV-2 infection, the main issue is the capacity to give the affected person artificial ventilation. A step-by-step approach to capacity is necessary, said Markstaller.

“There are always locked beds too”

“” There are always locked beds. They will be opened. Then efforts will be made to transfer patients in intensive care units back to normal wards as quickly as possible. Of course, you can also control the inflow somewhat. If there is no disadvantage for the person concerned, planned surgical interventions, which require intensive medical care afterwards, will be postponed “, explained the expert.

“In addition, in Austria, in addition to intensive care beds, we also have a relatively large number of beds in recovery wards that can be quickly upgraded for patients who need ventilation,” said Markstaller. The intermediate care units would then also be available.

But the technical facilities are only one point. “” Staff is a critical issue.